Skip to main content

Discretionary Transportation Grants: DOT Should Better Align Its Application Evaluation Process with Federal Guidance

GAO-24-106280 Published: Nov 06, 2023. Publicly Released: Nov 06, 2023.
Jump To:

Fast Facts

In FY 2022, the Department of Transportation's RAISE program awarded about $2.25 billion to transportation projects. As part of the RAISE application, DOT required capital grant applicants to analyze the costs and benefits of their projects.

According to our survey, 69% of applicants found this analysis challenging. DOT provided some cost-benefit analysis resources in 2022, but it hasn't reviewed whether more resources are needed.

We also found that DOT's application evaluation process didn't align with federal guidance in several areas—for example, it didn't consistently document how decisions were made.

We recommended addressing these issues.

Exterior entrance of the Department of Transportation HQ in Washington, D.C.

Skip to Highlights

Highlights

What GAO Found

In fiscal year 2022, the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) awarded $2.25 billion to 166 road, rail, and other surface transportation projects through a grant program known as Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE). DOT established a multiphase process which included evaluating applications against criteria in a merit review phase and evaluating applicant-submitted benefit-cost analyses. These analyses require applicants to show if a project expects greater benefits than costs.

Fiscal Year 2022 RAISE Application Evaluation and Selection Process

Fiscal Year 2022 RAISE Application Evaluation and Selection Process

In GAO's survey of RAISE applicants, 69 percent of capital grant applicants reported that they found developing the benefit-cost analysis very or moderately challenging. For example, some applicants told GAO they did not have the staff capacity or expertise to complete this analysis. DOT has provided guidance and webinars but has not fully reviewed if additional resources for applicants could more fully address their challenges. Addressing these challenges could help applicants more fully assess their projects' benefits and costs and give DOT the information it needs to make cost-effective award decisions.

DOT's implementation of its process for evaluating RAISE applications did not fully align with federal guidance for discretionary grant programs. Specifically, GAO found that DOT did not:

  • sufficiently assess whether evaluation teams consistently applied the merit review criteria,
  • consistently document decisions for advancing applications expected to have greater costs than benefits,
  • publicly disclose two selection factors used to make award decisions, or
  • consistently document a specific explanation for not selecting certain Highly Rated projects for funding.

Strengthening the RAISE evaluation process in these areas would position DOT to more fully demonstrate that it is implementing the program with enhanced transparency and making fair grant award decisions.

Why GAO Did This Study

Since 2009, DOT has awarded over $14 billion through a discretionary grant program referred to by DOT as RAISE. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act authorized RAISE for fiscal years 2022 through 2026 and detailed requirements for DOT to use in administering the program.

The act also includes a provision for GAO to examine DOT's administration of the RAISE program. This report: (1) describes DOT's application evaluation process, (2) examines challenges applicants reported experiencing and how DOT addressed these challenges, and (3) assesses the extent to which DOT's implementation of its application evaluation process aligned with federal guidance.

GAO reviewed relevant laws and DOT documents, such as RAISE's evaluation plan and meeting minutes, and interviewed DOT officials. GAO also conducted a generalizable survey of eligible fiscal year 2022 RAISE applicants. The response rate was 67 percent.

Recommendations

GAO is making five recommendations to DOT regarding the RAISE program: (1) address applicant challenges with developing a benefit-cost analysis, (2) implement additional oversight of evaluation teams, (3) consistently document specific evaluation decisions, (4) identify all selection factors, and (5) document specific rationales for selection decisions. DOT concurred with three recommendations, partially concurred with one, and did not concur with one. GAO continues to believe these recommendations should be fully implemented.

Recommendations for Executive Action

Agency Affected Recommendation Status
Department of Transportation The Secretary of Transportation should review what additional resources and flexibilities would best address challenges applicants face developing a benefit-cost analysis and take steps to implement them. (Recommendation 1)
Open
As of March 2024, DOT has partially addressed this recommendation by publishing a benefit-cost analysis spreadsheet on the DOT website to assist RAISE applicants in completing their analyses. According to DOT, this new spreadsheet includes prepopulated formulas for calculations that are common to all benefit-cost analyses and is available to applicants for the fiscal year 2024 RAISE grants. In addition, DOT officials said that DOT hosted multiple webinars in December 2023 and January 2024 to explain how to conduct a benefit-cost analysis and use the new template and held "office hours" to answer applicant questions. However, DOT has not yet provided information to GAO on how it determined that this template would best address applicant challenges with developing a benefit-cost analysis, and whether additional resources and flexibilities are necessary, as GAO recommended. GAO has requested this information from DOT and will continue to follow DOT's progress in implementing this recommendation.
Department of Transportation The Secretary of Transportation should ensure RAISE officials implement oversight steps to assess the consistency of ratings across evaluation teams in the merit review phase and document these steps in the RAISE evaluation plan. (Recommendation 2)
Open
As of March 2024, DOT stated that it concurred with this recommendation and agreed to provide additional information on its planned actions by May 2024. GAO will monitor DOT's efforts to address this recommendation.
Department of Transportation The Secretary of Transportation should ensure RAISE officials develop an enhanced process to verify that DOT documents all decisions to include projects with a negative benefit-cost analysis rating on the Highly Rated List prior to sending the Highly Rated List to the Secretary of Transportation. (Recommendation 3)
Open
As of March 2024, DOT stated that it concurred with this recommendation and agreed to provide additional information on its planned actions by May 2024. GAO will monitor DOT's efforts to address this recommendation.
Department of Transportation The Secretary of Transportation should ensure that the RAISE NOFO identifies all selection factors, such as those used when creating a selection portfolio or other process to facilitate award decisions. (Recommendation 4)
Open
As of March 2024, DOT stated that it concurred with this recommendation and agreed to provide additional information on its planned actions by May 2024. However, in its written response to GAO's report, DOT also stated that it sufficiently notified potential applicants that geographic diversity would be a selection factor through its statement in the notice of funding opportunity (NOFO) that "the Secretary selects projects from the Highly Rated List for award, consistent with the selection criteria and statutory requirements for geographic and modal diversity." However, as stated in our report, DOT guidance requires DOT to disclose policy factors used during the selection process in an objective and clear way. While DOT's NOFO informed applicants that award selections would be consistent with statutory requirements for geographic diversity, it did not inform applicants of how DOT would implement the geographic diversity requirement. We maintain that knowing that DOT established a goal of awarding one grant to each state or territory would have provided applicants with clear and objective information that they can use to assess their odds of receiving an award and factor into their application decision. As such, we believe that DOT should fully implement our recommendation to ensure that the RAISE NOFO identifies all selection factors used to assist the Secretary in making award decisions. DOT agreed to provide details on its planned actions to address this recommendation by May 2024. GAO will monitor DOT's efforts regarding this recommendation.
Department of Transportation The Secretary of Transportation should ensure that RAISE officials document a specific rationale explaining why all non-awarded Highly Rated projects were not selected for an award. (Recommendation 5)
Open
As of March 2024, DOT has not addressed this recommendation. In its written response to GAO's report, DOT stated that it did not concur with this recommendation. Specifically, DOT stated that its selection portfolio process adequately documents why it did not select projects and that no further documentation is necessary. We disagree for the reasons outlined in our report. Specifically, DOT's selection portfolio did not provide specific rationales for not awarding projects, as required by DOT guidance. In addition, while the selection portfolio stated that a project was not included in the portfolio, it did not explicitly provide the rationale for why DOT did not award these projects. We continue to believe that documenting specific rationales for not selecting projects would provide a clearer picture of how DOT makes award decisions, and that DOT should fully implement our recommendation. GAO will monitor DOT's efforts regarding this recommendation.

Full Report

Office of Public Affairs

Topics

Cost analysisFinancial assistanceGrant applicationsGrant awardsGrant monitoringGrant programsMode of transportationProgram transparencySurface transportationTransportationDiscretionary grants