Skip to main content

Nuclear Nonproliferation: The Administration's 2018 Plan for Verification and Monitoring Met Most Reporting Requirements but Did Not Include Future Costs and Funding Needs

GAO-18-617 Published: Sep 14, 2018. Publicly Released: Sep 14, 2018.
Jump To:

Fast Facts

In 2015 and 2017, federal law directed the President to submit a plan to Congress for monitoring the potential spread of nuclear weapons and materials. In earlier reports, we found those plans did not address required areas.

A 2018 law again directed the President to produce a plan, which the National Nuclear Security Administration prepared. Most required subjects were included, such as plans for research and development and international engagement. However, the plan did not include information on its cost over the next 10 years.

We recommended the NNSA provide estimates of the funding needed to support the activities in the plan.

Radiation equipment designed at Sandia National Lab detects neutron levels

This photo shows a person holding a shoebox-sized piece of equipment in front of white metal drums

This photo shows a person holding a shoebox-sized piece of equipment in front of white metal drums

Skip to Highlights

Highlights

What GAO Found

GAO found that the 2018 plan provided details on most of the reporting requirements in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2018, but did not include information on future costs and funding needs (see table below). In the NDAA, Congress directed the President to produce a plan that would address four reporting requirements: (1) a plan and roadmap on verification, detection and monitoring efforts, including details on costs and funding needs over 10 years, (2) an international engagement plan, (3) a research and development plan, and (4) a description of interagency engagement. The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), a separately organized agency within the Department of Energy, developed the plan and submitted it to Congress in April 2018.

GAO Assessment of 2018 Verification and Monitoring Plan

Reporting requirements

GAO assessment

Plan and roadmap

Partly addressed; did not provide details on future costs and funding needs

International engagement plan

Addressed with detail

Research and development plan

Addressed with detail

Interagency engagement

Addressed with detail

Source: GAO analysis of National Nuclear Security Administration information. Ɩ GAO-18-617

According to NNSA officials, NNSA did not include long-term costs and funding needs in the plan because identifying these needs is unrealistic for several reasons, including because agencies have little influence over the spending priorities of other departments outside of the President's budget process. However, NNSA and other agencies already develop plans with long-term funding priorities and cost estimates for other programs. Because the plan does not include any estimates on future costs and funding needs, it limits congressional understanding of the long-term affordability of the nation's verification and monitoring efforts and its ability to make necessary funding and policy decisions. GAO has previously reported that providing estimates of future costs and funding needs can help congressional decisionmakers prioritize projects and identify long-term funding needs. By including in its plan estimates of future costs and funding needed to support the activities in the plan, NNSA could help provide assurance that agencies are allocating appropriate resources to the verification and monitoring effort and that these resources are aligned with future activities and processes.

Why GAO Did This Study

Countering the proliferation of nuclear weapons is a national security priority that is challenged by weapons advances from existing nuclear states and other actors possessing or attempting to possess nuclear weapons. To help address these issues, Congress directed the Administration in 2015 and 2017 to develop a plan for verification and monitoring relating to the potential proliferation of nuclear weapons, components of such weapons, and fissile material. GAO reviewed the first plan submitted to Congress in 2015, and an update submitted in 2017. GAO reported in March 2018 that this plan and update generally did not address the congressionally mandated reporting requirements.

In the fiscal year 2018 NDAA, Congress directed the Administration to develop another plan and included a provision for GAO to review the plan. This report assesses whether the Administration's new plan provided details on the reporting requirements included in the NDAA.

To determine whether the plan provided details on the reporting requirements, GAO reviewed the fiscal year 2018 plan and assessed whether the plan included details for each of the elements as required by the NDAA.

Recommendations

GAO recommends that the Administrator of NNSA should include in its plan estimates of future costs and funding needed to support the activities in the plan. NNSA neither agreed nor disagreed with the recommendation, but said it planned no further action. GAO maintains that the recommendation is valid.

Recommendations for Executive Action

Agency Affected Recommendation Status
National Nuclear Security Administration The Administrator of NNSA should include in its plan for verification and monitoring estimates of future costs and funding needed to support the activities in the plan. (Recommendation 1)
Closed – Not Implemented
NNSA has stated that implementing the recommendation would not be practical or possible, and that it intends to take no further action in response to it. NNSA identified challenges of providing the requested interagency out-year cost and funding data, and stated that it had verified with the congressional committees that it was impractical to include those elements in the plan. Among other reasons, NNSA stated that it would not be able to meaningfully quantify the level of, and associated costs for, research and development activities required to achieve specific goals in the plan, especially in the early stages of R&D. NNSA also stated that developing 10 year budget estimates for the plan would not be not aligned with NNSA's and other agencies' timelines and internal processes for planning, programming, budgeting, and execution. In addition, there is no current requirement for NNSA to produce an updated version of the plan.

Full Report

GAO Contacts

Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
Managing Director
Office of Public Affairs

Topics

Budget estimatesCost estimatesFederal fundsNuclear nonproliferationNuclear weaponsResearch and developmentReporting requirementsNuclear securityNational defenseWeapons of mass destruction