From the U.S. Government Accountability Office, www.gao.gov Transcript for: FDA Oversight of Foreign Drug Safety Description: Audio interview by GAO staff with Marcia Crosse, Director, Health Care Related GAO Work: GAO-17-143 Drug Safety: FDA Has Improved Its Foreign Drug Inspection Program, but Needs to Assess the Effectiveness and Staffing of its Foreign Offices Released: January 2017 [ Background Music ] [ Narrator: ] Welcome to GAO's Watchdog Report, your source for news and information from the U.S. Government Accountability Office. It's January 2017. As more drugs are manufactured overseas, FDA's oversight of drugs in the United States is getting more complicated. FDA reports that more than 40 percent of finished drugs and 80 percent of active pharmaceutical ingredients are produced overseas. A team led by Marcia Crosse, a director in GAO's Health Care team, recently reviewed FDA's oversight of foreign drugs. Jacques Arsenault sat down with Marcia to talk about what they found. [ Jacques Arsenault: ] A lot of the drugs that are sold in the United States are produced overseas. Can you explain how does FDA make sure that they're safe? [ Marcia Crosse: ] Yes, you're right a lot of the drugs are made overseas. About 80 percent of the ingredients in drugs, and about 40 percent of the finished drugs are actually produced overseas, and imported into this country. And the main approach that FDA has for making sure that the drugs are safe is actually going and physically inspecting the manufacturing facility to be sure that all of the safety and quality standards are being maintained at that facility, so that the drugs that are being produced are exactly to specification. There are a lot of facilities, and increasingly those facilities are overseas, so FDA has been moving to do more of its inspections overseas. Of course, the manufacturers have some responsibility for ensuring the safety of their drugs, after all, they're the ones selling the product. But FDA is there as an important safety check to be sure that drugs are safe and effective. [ Jacques Arsenault: ] And can we say whether FDA is doing a good job of monitoring these drugs? [ Marcia Crosse: ] I would say that they are doing a lot more to monitor the safety of the drugs than they had been at one time. Now, they are actually employing a risk model that lets them determine which facilities they should go to on what schedule. In the past, they were going just kind of on a regular schedule, but some drugs are more difficult to make. And to be sure that they're making their specifications, and we want to be sure that FDA is going more frequently to those facilities than to places that are making easier to manufacture drugs, and places that have had a good, clean inspection history. So FDA now has a model that looks at the risk of the facility, and its inspection history to try to decide where to go to when. [ Jacques Arsenault: ] One of the things I noticed in your report is, you also looked at FDA's foreign offices. And it sounds like FDA doesn't seem to know if having these foreign offices is helping them monitor the drugs. Can you tell me a little more about that? [ Marcia Crosse: ] Yes, FDA first established these offices in 2008 in part because of this trend to globalization in manufacturing. It's true, they're not really doing a good job of tracking what it is that these offices are contributing. They do think that they are helping, they have people now in-country to observe what kinds of conditions are going on to be able to identify facilities. They also do some of the inspections with staff based in these offices, and the staff in these offices also do a lot of outreach to the manufacturers, and the drug industry in those countries to help them understand what the standards are and what FDA's expectations are, so that they're better able to meet the requirements. But we felt like they were not doing enough to really track what the contributions are. [ Jacques Arsenault: ] Now this isn't the first time that GAO has looked at FDA's oversight of foreign drugs, and it sounds from our conversation like some things have changed. Have things improved, or are we basically seeing some of the same problems and challenges? [ Marcia Crosse: ] I do think things have improved. They're doing a lot more inspections overseas. In fiscal year 2015 for the first time they actually did more inspections of foreign facilities than of domestic facilities. And that's important, because there are more foreign facilities. That's an improvement that the rate of inspection has shifted to where the manufacturing is. They also are getting to places that they hadn't been to before, but we do think there's a problem in that, there are still at least one-third of the facilities that they don't have an inspection history for. They can't say if they've ever been inspected, or if it's been more than 10 years since they've been there. And so, they, you know, part of the model that I mentioned is that they look at the inspection history. On a third of the facilities they don't have an inspection history, and so I think that is still a continuing problem. [ Jacques Arsenault: ] So, then can you talk about the recommendations that GAO is making in this report? [ Marcia Crosse: ] Yes, well, we didn't make specific recommendations about the one-third, because they do have a plan to go to those facilities in the next 3 years. They are trying to rapidly get through the facilities that they haven't been to. But, as I mentioned, we think there's some problems with assessing the contributions to the foreign offices, and so we're recommending that they actually take further steps to asses those contributions by systematically tracking information to measure whether the activities of the offices are specifically contributing to the safety of the drug products. You know, not just look at how many inspections they've done, but what the impact of that has been. The other thing that we think is important for them to do, is to look at the staffing of these offices. They have had a chronic problem in being able to fill the position in these offices. And so, we think it's important that they establish some goals to achieve the appropriate staffing levels for the offices. To do that by looking specifically at each location, and what kind of staff and what mix of staff they need. Because right now, they have almost half of those positions are vacant, and we think they need to fill them if the offices are going to be able to be effective. [ Jacques Arsenault: ] And finally, what would you say is the bottom line here? [ Marcia Crosse: ] I think that the bottom line for us is that they're -- FDA is still catching up with the globalization of manufacturing. They've come a long way, they've actually made a lot of progress over the time we've been looking at this, but they still have some areas where we think they need to improve in order to be sure that drugs manufactured overseas, are just as safe as the drugs that are manufactured in the United States. [ Background Music ] [ Narrator: ] To learn more, visit GAO.gov and be sure to tune in to the next episode of GAO's Watchdog Report for more from the congressional watchdog, the U.S. Government Accountability Office.