From the U.S. Government Accountability Office, www.gao.gov Transcript for: State Health Insurance Marketplaces Description: Audio Interview by GAO staff with Valerie Melvin, Director, Information Technology Related GAO Work: GAO-15-527: State Health Insurance Marketplaces: CMS Should Improve Oversight of State Information Technology Projects Released: September 2015 [ Background Music ] [ Narrator: ] Welcome to GAO's Watchdog Report, your source for news and information from the U.S. Government Accountability Office. It's September 2015. The Affordable Care Act required the establishment of health insurance exchanges or marketplaces to allow consumers and small employers to compare and purchase health insurance plans. States could either create their own marketplaces or have their residents use a federally facilitated marketplace. All of which require information technology projects to operate. A team led by Valerie Melvin, a director in GAO's Information Technology team, recently reviewed federal and state IT efforts related to health insurance marketplaces. GAO's Jacques Arsenault sat down with Valerie to talk about what they found. [ Jacques Arsenault: ] Can you talk a bit about the size and scope of these health insurance marketplaces? [ Valerie Melvin: ] Yes. The development of the state health insurance marketplace is a very large nationwide effort that involves establishing health insurance marketplaces in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. These marketplaces are expected to provide a seamless single point of access for private citizens as well as small employers to be able to apply for and obtain healthcare coverage. There are particular functions that these marketplaces have to provide in terms of providing eligibility and enrollment, plan management, that being the health insurance plans, managing the finances related to those plans whether it be calculating the cost of the plans or paying for the premiums, and consumer assistance which involves making sure that there are services available to those that are applying for the health insurance plans. To provide these capabilities, they have to rely on the development of information technology systems. In some cases, it's actual modifications to existing systems or it may be developing systems or interfaces to other federal systems. There are different types of marketplaces that a particular state can establish. The majority of the states have used the federally facilitated marketplace or some form of that marketplace. But there are 14 states that established and are operating their own marketplaces along with 3 others that have developed their own but are using some portion of the federal solution to assist them. These states have access to two sources of federal funding for establishing these marketplaces. That being federal grants as well as some portion of Medicaid matching funds that they receive for their Medicaid eligibility and enrollment systems. With regard to the federal grant funding, states have reported spending about $1.45 billion on IT projects. [ Jacques Arsenault: ] So then what did you find about how well these marketplaces are working? [ Valerie Melvin: ] We found that the states have faced challenges in designing, developing, and establishing the marketplaces as it pertained to the information technology projects that we needed to support them. And we found, for example, that the 14 states that had state-based marketplaces were developing and operating IT systems to support their marketplaces. However, not all of the functions had been completed as of February 2015. We found in some cases, for example, that eligibility and enrollment functions were in place but that in other instances, the states had not been able to get all of these functions in and were having to still rely on some manual processes to supplement their automated functionality. [ Jacques Arsenault: ] Now, your team also surveyed state officials. What did they tell you about some of the challenges that they faced? [ Valerie Melvin: ] The state officials identified a number of challenges. Some of these were common across the states that were developing their own IT solutions. We found challenges in five primary areas. Those areas being project management and oversight, challenges related to having compressed time frames for being able to develop and test their systems. We found challenges related to the systems design and development efforts for the states that were using the federally facilitated marketplace. That included, again, compressed timeframes as they were being required to continually define their requirements as they were changed at the federal level. We also found that there were concerns and challenges related to the significant rework and critical functionality that had to be deferred. Thirdly, we found that with regard to the state-based marketplaces, there were design and development challenges that were similar to those with the federally facilitated marketplace states that included interfaces with the insurers and developing their website eligibility functions. In many instances that resulted in them having to have work arounds to circumvent defects in the eligibility and enrollment functionality that they were developing. We also found challenges related to resource allocation and distribution as it related to having adequate staffing and funding. In some instances, staff that had been requested were not brought on board or they had not been able to put the certified project management in place that was needed to oversee the initiatives. Then lastly we also saw some challenges related to such matters as their call centers not being able to handle the volume of requests that were coming into it as these problems were permeating across the state efforts. [ Jacques Arsenault: ] And finally, what would you say is the bottom line of this report? [ Valerie Melvin: ] CMS has provided billions of dollars, funds for the marketplace IT projects. And while the states have largely established these systems, there's still work to be done. And there's still challenges within the efforts that they have to undertake. These efforts and these challenges necessitate that CMS provide an effective oversight role. [ Background Music ] [ Narrator: ] To learn more, visit GAO.gov and be sure to tune in to the next episode of GAO's Watchdog Report for more from the congressional watchdog, the U.S. Government Accountability Office.